| Effects of Serenoa Repens, Selenium and Lycopene (Profluss®) on chronic inflammation associated with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: results of "FLOG" (Flogosis and Profluss in Prostatic and Genital Disease), a multicentre Italian study(Download pdf)
 doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2013.02.10
       Giuseppe Morgia, Sebastiano Cimino, Vincenzo Favilla, Giorgio Ivan Russo, Francesco Squadrito3, Giuseppe Mucciardi, Lorenzo Masieri4, Letteria Minutoli, Giuseppe Grosso, Tommaso Castelli
 Department of Urology (GM, SC, VF, GIR, TC) and Department of Hygiene and Public Health, University of Catania (GG), Catania, Department of Urology (LM) and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine and Pharmacology – Section of Pharmacology (GM), University of Messina Messina and Department of Urology, University of Florence (LM), Florence, Italy Original Article Vol. 39 (2): 214-221, March - April, 2013 ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of  Profluss® on prostatic chronic inflammation (PCI).Materials and Methods: We prospectively  enrolled 168 subjects affected by LUTS due to bladder outlet obstruction  submitted to 12 cores prostatic biopsy for suspected prostate cancer + 2 cores  collected for PCI valuation. First group consisted of 108 subjects, with  histological diagnosis of PCI associated with BPH and high grade PIN and/or  ASAP, randomly assigned to 1:1 ratio to daily Profluss® (group I) for 6 months  or to control group (group Ic). Second group consisted of 60 subjects, with  histological diagnosis of BPH, randomly assigned to 1:1 ratio to daily  Profluss® + α-blockers treatment (group II) for  3 months or to control group (group IIc). After 6 months first group underwent  24 cores prostatic re-biopsy + 2 cores for PCI while after 3 months second  group underwent two-cores prostatic for PCI. Specimens were evaluated for  changes in inflammation parameters and for density of T-cells (CD3, CD8),  B-cells (CD20) and macrophages (CD68).
 Results: At follow-up there were statistical  significant reductions of extension and grading of flogosis, mean values of  CD20, CD3, CD68 and mean PSA value in group I compared to Ic, while extension  and grading of flogosis in group II were inferior to IIc but not statistical  significant. A statistically significant reduction in the density of CD20, CD3,  CD68, CD8 was demonstrated in group II in respect to control IIc.
 Conclusions: Serenoa repens+Selenium+Lycopene may have an anti-inflammatory activity that could be of  interest in the treatment of PCI in BPH and/or PIN/ASAP patients.
 Key  words: Phytotherapy; Serenoa; Inflammation;  Prostatitis; Prostatic Hyperplasia INTRODUCTION             Benign  prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common cause of bothersome lower urinary tract  symptoms in man, representing a growing entity in terms of healthcare costs and  morbidity.Approximately  50% of men aged between 50 and 60 years, 60% of men aged between 60 and 70  years, and up to 90% of men aged > 80 years have some degree of benign  prostatic enlargement (BPE) (1).
 Medical  therapies can provide adequate alleviation of BPE symptoms (LUTS): The two  primary classes of oral medications that are prescribed for the treatment of  symptoms are alpha-blockers and 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors (5ARIs). Despite  medical therapy improves LUTS, some adverse events (ejaculatory dysfunction,  loss of libido, erectile dysfunction) are caused by the treatment, worsening an  already compromised sexual function (2).
 The  aetiology of BPH is still far from being fully understood but  multiple partially overlapping and complementary theories have been proposed (3).  There are some evidences that prostatic inflammation could be a key component  in BPE and BPH progression.
 Two  of the major clinical studies on BPH (MTOPS and Reduce study) recently  demonstrated the link between histological prostatic inflammation and prostate  enlargement or symptoms scores (4,5). Numerous major key players in chronic  inflammation have been studied in BPH: varieties of growth factors and  cytokines have been shown to be involved both in the inflammatory process and  in the epithelial/stromal prostatic cells interactions (6). These mediators are  released in the prostatic gland by inflammatory cells that can be found on most  of the surgery-derived BPH specimens (7).
 The  inflammatory cells may trigger a sophisticated and well-orchestrated  inflammatory cascade, resulting in excessive oxidative stress, activation of  the transcription factor nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB),  production of several cytokines and overexpression of inducible-cyclooxygenase  (COX-2), inducible-nitric-oxide-synthase (iNOS) and 5-lipoxygenase (5-LOX),  leading, in turn, to the release of prostaglandins, nitrates, and leukotrienes.  Furthermore, inflammatory cells produce growth factors, such as vascular  endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), which may  support fibromuscular growth in BPH (8).
 Plant  extracts have been used in the medical management of BPH-induced LUTS with the  aim to relieve symptoms without adverse events related to treatment (9).
 Serenoa  Repens (SeR), derived from the berries of the saw palmetto tree, is the most  popular naturally derived medication for BPH (10). Several mechanisms of action  have been proposed to explain its therapeutic efficacy, including inhibition of  5α-reductase and dihydrotestosterone binding to  androgen receptors, a weak α1-adrenergic  receptor antagonism, inhibition of growth factors-induced prostate cell  proliferation and inhibition of COX-2 and 5-LOX (11).
 Besides  SeR, both lycopene (LY), a dietary carotenoid synthesized by plants, fruits, and  microorganisms with a strong antioxidant activity, and selenium (Se), an  essential trace element mainly functioning through seleno-proteins and able to  promote an optimal antioxidant/oxidant balance, have been shown to exert  beneficial effects in BPH (12-16).
 The  aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of Profluss® ( SeR-Se-LY) in  reducing chronic inflammation in patient with benign prostatic hyperplasia and/or  PIN/ASAP.
     MATERIALS AND METHODS Study design, patients selection criteria and  allocationThe “Flogosis And Profluss in  Prostatic and Genital Disease” (FLOG) study was a multicentre study involving 9  urological Italian centres between January 2009 and December 2010 that analysed  prospectively collected data of two category of patients affected by BPH and/or  PIN/ASAP. The inclusion criteria for the first group were: presence of LUTS due  to bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) secondary to clinical BPH, assessed by urodynamic and pressure flow  evaluation, PSA >  4ng/mL and/or DRE  abnormality and/or abnormal findings on transrectal ultrasound, 12 cores prostatic biopsy performed for  suspected prostate cancer with two more cores collected from the left and right lobes (for chronic  inflammation evaluation), histological diagnosis of prostatic chronic  inflammation associated with BPH and high grade PIN and/or ASAP. Exclusion  criteria were: treatment with NSAIDs or corticosteroids in the previous 6  months, urinary infection, treatment with finasteride or dutasteride, phytotherapy in the previous 6 months; diagnosis  of prostatic cancer (PCa). Fourty patients were excluded after PCa was  diagnosed and finally 108 patients were analysed in this study. Subjects were  randomly assigned to 1:1 ratio to SeR 320mg+LY5mg+Se50mcg/day treatment (group  I) for 6 months or to control group (group Ic) and then underwent 24 cores  prostatic re-biopsy with two more needle biopsies (for chronic inflammation evaluation) collected  from the left and right lobes in the same previous areas allowing similar histopathological  analysis.
 Inclusion  criteria for second group were: presence of LUTS due to bladder outlet  obstruction (BOO) secondary to clinical BPH, assessed by urodynamic and pressure flow  evaluation, PSA >  4ng/mL and/or DRE  abnormality and/or abnormal findings on transrectal ultrasound, 12 cores prostatic biopsy performed  for suspected prostate cancer with two more cores collected from the left and right lobes (for chronic  inflammation valuation), histological diagnosis of prostatic chronic  inflammation associated with BPH and indication for surgical treatment.  Exclusion criteria were: treatment with NSAIDs or corticosteroids in the previous  6 months; treatment with finasteride or dutasteride, phytotherapy in the  previous 6 months, urinary infection, diagnosis of PCa. Sixty-six consecutive  patients met inclusion criteria. Six patients dropped out for various reasons:  2 lost to follow-up and 4 excluded due to concomitant drug medication which was  not allowed by the criteria we had established. Finally, a total of 60 patients  were included in the analysis and they were enrolled and randomly assigned to  1:1 ratio to SeR 320mg+LY5mg+Se50mcg/day and α-blockers treatment (group II) for 3  months or to control group (group IIc). At month 3 two-cores prostatic biopsy was performed in the same  areas of the previous allowing similar histopathological analysis and then underwent Transurethral Resection  of Prostate (TURP).
 Principles outlined in the Declaration of  Helsinki were followed and all patients signed a written informed consent form.
 Histopathological evaluation Prostate  specimens were fixed with 10% buffered formalin for 8-12 hours (biopsy), 12-24  hours (TURP) and sent for central review by a blinded pathologist.
 Coloration  of specimens was performed by hematoxylin-eosin. On the main representative area of each histological specimen, parameters  of flogosis like extensions  and grading of flogosis were evaluated, according to the score of Nickel (17).
 On paraffin sections of 5 micron  were assessed, by immunohistochemical technique using monoclonal antibodies  (Dako company), B-lymphocytes (CD20), T-lymphocytes (CD3, CD8), and macrophages  (CD68). The detection system was the universal kit LSAB of the Dako company. All  the immunohistochemical procedures were performed using the automated  immunostaining Optimax Plus system (Biogenex, San Ramon, USA).
 The immunostaining specimens were  assessed using the Axioplan Zeiss microscope with Axiovision software. For each  specimen with positive immunostaining for CD20, CD3, CD8 and CD68, only the  main representative areas were selected, using a zoom 10x.
 Subsequently the positive cells were  counted in three fields with lens 20x, within this area, the medium value was  considered as expression of B and T lymphocyte density and as expression of the  macrophages density present in the specimen.
 Statistical Analysis             Baseline characteristics are  presented as frequencies of occurrence or mean and standard deviation as  appropriate. Statistical differences among groups of frequencies were tested by  Chi-square test. Given the not normal distribution of continuous data, we  tested differences among independent samples by Mann-Whitney U-test.All statistical tests were  two-tailed and p-value < 0.05 were considered significant. Data were entered  into Microsoft Excel for Windows (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA).  Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows release 17.0 (SPSS  Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
 RESULTS Clinical results Baseline demographic and clinical  characteristics of patients analyzed are listed in Table-1. No differences in terms of  parameters collected, such as age, prostate volume, PSA values, urodynamic  findings and other general health status variants were observed between groups.
 
 Histopathological findings and results At 6-month histopathological  evaluation, a significant difference of flogosis was demonstrated between Groups I and Ic, with a  reduction both of extension (P < 0.001) and grading (P < 0.001) of  flogosis among treated patients (Figure-1).
 Histopathological evaluation  performed at 3 months in patients enrolled in Group II revealed no  significant difference  of extension and grading of flogosis in respect to group control IIc (Figure-1). However, a slight reduction of extension and grading could be observed in the treated  group.
 A significant reduction of total  interstitial mononuclear cells, B lymphocytes, T lymphocytes and macrophages in  Group I compared with control group (Ic) was observed at 6-month evaluation (P < 0.001)  (Table-2).
 Among patients with BPH (Group II), total interstitial mononuclear cells, B lymphocytes, T lymphocytes and  macrophages were significantly reduced at 3 month evaluation compared with control group (P < 0.001) (Table-3).
 According with the reduction of  extension and grade of flogosis in Group I, mean PSA values was  significantly lower than in control group (P < 0.0001) (Table-2).
 No statistical significant reduction  of PSA value was demonstrated between Groups II and IIc (Table-3).
 
 
  DISCUSSION
             Almost all surgery-derived BPH specimens  show inflammatory infiltrates at histological examination (18,19); yet most of these patients neither have  clinical signs of infection nor any correlation with bacterial or other foreign  antigens.In a study by Robert et al. it was  found that most patients, treated by surgery for complicated and/or symptomatic  BPH, had inflammatory cells infiltrating BPH tissues: 81% had T-lymphocytes  markers, 52% had B-lymphocytes markers, and 82% had macrophages markers (20). Therefore, in patients with high-grade  prostatic inflammation IPSS score and prostate volume were significantly  higher. These findings were confirmed by Mishra et al. (21), who compared pathology specimens in 374 patients who underwent  transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for either LUTS or urinary retention.  They found 70% of men with urinary retention have acute and/or chronic  inflammation versus 45% of men without LUTS.
 These data may support the  hypothesis that an anti-inflammatory therapy may act to relief BPH symptoms and  may also condition prostate tissue growth (22).
 Among  all phytotherapics, the lipidosterolic extract of Serenoa repens, a compound  used to relief symptoms of BPH, had shown an anti-inflammatory activity  modifying the production of leukotrienes and 5 hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid,  via the inhibition of the oxidative enzyme 5 lypoxygenase rather than  phospholipase A2 or cell viability. Since the infiltration of inflammatory  cells appears to have a role in BPH, inhibition of the production of  chemotactic leukotrienes and other 5 lypoxygenase metabolites by Serenoa repens  could be useful in BPH treatment (23).
 Serenoa Repens, in a multicenter,  open pilot study, was also evaluated for its effects on inflammatory markers.  Tumor necrosis factor-α and IL-1b were  dramatically lower in the Serenoa repens-treated group; both biological markers  have been used as indicators of prostatic inflammation in cases of chronic  prostatitis (23).
 It has been hypothesized that SeR,  Ly, and Se, administered together, might amplify their therapeutic efficacy on  the proliferative and inflammatory component of BPH (24).
 The efficacy of this association was  recently confirmed in an in vitro and in vivo comparison study performed on  rats with partial bladder outlet obstruction: prostate pro-inflammatory  phenotype, as well as hyperplasia, was reduced more efficiently than the single  compounds (25).
 Analyzing specimens from patients  with high grade PIN and/or ASAP, a statistical significant reduction in the  extension, and in the grading of the inflammatory cells infiltrate was demonstrated  in the patients treated with SeR+Ly+Se (Group I).
 Therefore, it was confirmed by  immune-histochemical technique using monoclonal antibodies, that mononuclear cell infiltration (B-lymphocytes CD20, T-lymphocytes  CD3-CD8 and macrophages CD68) is the most common pattern. SeR+Ly+Se combination therapy resulted in a statistical significant  reduction of this inflammatory infiltrate.
 The inflammatory infiltrates are responsible for the  secretion of cytokines, which are involved in the paracrine and autocrine  regulation of stromal and epithelial cell  growth. This mechanism has been considered to influence the development of  prostate cancer and BPH (26): SeR+Se+Ly  association acting on these pathway may be considered to chemoprevent both  conditions.
 According with the reduction of extension,  grade of flogosis and CD20, CD3, CD8,CD68, mean PSA values decreased from 5.62 ± 1.04 to 4.16 ± 0.89 (p < 0.001), suggesting that PSA value  could be an useful marker of prostate inflammation. This result was underlined  also in a study from Li Gui-Zhong et al. Thus, if an elevated PSA level is  considered in association with histological inflammation with detailed grading  in a high number of biopsy specimens, it might prevent unnecessary repeated  biopsies (27).
 The aim of the analysis performed in  the Group II was to verify whether in patients with bladder outlet obstruction,  waiting for TURP, SeR+Se+LY association determined the same effects observed in  Group I.
 Comparing the results with control  group, there were no statistically significant differences in terms of reducing  the extension and grading of inflammation.
 As reported in several studies, the  extent of inflammation and grade correlated positively with the serum PSA level  (28,29). Probably in the Group II we have  selected patients with lower extension and grade of flogosis: this finding is  also supported by the fact that between the two subsets there were no  statistical significant differences in terms of total PSA.
 Analyzing the inflammatory  infiltrate, surprisingly it has been documented a statistical significant  reduction of CD20, CD3, CD8, CD68. In the study by Vela Navarrete et al., SeR  alone showed a reduction of the biological markers (TNFα and IL-1β):  however, the histological findings resulted in a reduction only in the number  of lymphocytes B (CD20) (23).
 Possible limits of this research  could be represented by the lack of placebo controlling. A multicentre and  randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study could fill this gap and  offer results that better clarify the activity of this category of treatment.
 CONCLUSIONS             Our data support the  anti-inflammatory activity of the combination of SeR+Se+LY in patients with  histological inflammation detected on biopsy specimens. Patients with bladder  outlet obstruction could benefit from this therapy on the inflammatory  component of BPH. More data supporting these findings may confirm these  evidences. CONFLICT  OF INTERESTNone declared.
   Acknowledgments Authors are  grateful to University of Catania, University of Firenze, University of Roma  Torvergata, University of Messina, Hospital of Bronte (Catania), Hospital  “Buccheri La Ferla” (Palermo), Hospital of Napoli, Hospital of Avellino, and Israelitic  Hospital (Rome) to have been part of the study. Authors also wish to thank  Stefano Marventano for editing the manuscript. REFERENCES 
  Berry SJ, Coffey DS, Walsh PC, Ewing  LL: The development of human benign prostatic hyperplasia with age. J Urol.  1984; 132: 474-9. Miner M, Rosenberg MT, Perelman MA:  Treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in benign prostatic hyperplasia and  its impact on sexual function. Clin Ther. 2006; 28: 13-25.Tang J, Yang J: Etiopathogenesis of  benign prostatic hypeprlasia. Indian J Urol. 2009; 25: 312-7.Roehrborn CG, Kaplan SA, Noble WD: The  impact of acute or chronic inflammation in baseline biopsy on the risk of  clinical progression of BPE: Results from the MTOPS study. AUA Meeting 2005. J Urol, suppl., 2005; 173: 346, abstract  1277. Nickel JC, Roehrborn CG, O'Leary MP,  Bostwick DG, Somerville MC, Rittmaster RS: The relationship between prostate  inflammation and lower urinary tract symptoms: examination of baseline data  from the REDUCE trial. Eur Urol. 2008; 54: 1379-84.Kramer G, Mitteregger D, Marberger  M: Is benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) an immune inflammatory disease? Eur  Urol. 2007; 51: 1202-16. Di Silverio F, Gentile V, De Matteis  A, Mariotti G, Giuseppe V, Luigi PA, et al.: Distribution of inflammation,  pre-malignant lesions, incidental carcinoma in histologically confirmed benign  prostatic hyperplasia: a retrospective analysis. Eur Urol. 2003; 43: 164-75.Sciarra A, Di Silverio F, Salciccia  S, Autran Gomez AM, Gentilucci A, Gentile V: Inflammation and chronic prostatic  diseases: evidence for a link? Eur Urol. 2007; 52: 964-72.Comhaire F, Mahmoud A: Preventing  diseases of the prostate in the elderly using hormones and nutriceuticals. Aging Male. 2004; 7: 155-69. Suzuki M, Ito Y, Fujino T, Abe M,  Umegaki K, Onoue S, et  al.: Pharmacological effects of saw palmetto extract in the  lower urinary tract. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2009; 30: 227-81. Buck AC: Is there a scientific basis  for the therapeutic effects of serenoa repens in benign prostatic hyperplasia?  Mechanisms of action. J Urol. 2004; 172: 1792-9.Diwadkar-Navsariwala V, Prins GS,  Swanson SM, Birch LA, Ray VH, Hedayat S, et al.: Selenoprotein deficiency  accelerates prostate carcinogenesis in a transgenic model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U  S A. 2006; 103: 8179-84.Schwarz S, Obermüller-Jevic UC,  Hellmis E, Koch W, Jacobi G, Biesalski HK: Lycopene inhibits disease  progression in patients with benign prostate hyperplasia. J Nutr. 2008; 138:  49-53. Kandaş NO, Randolph C, Bosland MC:  Differential effects of selenium on benign and malignant prostate epithelial  cells: stimulation of LNCaP cell growth by noncytotoxic, low selenite  concentrations. Nutr Cancer. 2009; 61: 251-64.Wertz K, Siler U, Goralczyk R:  Lycopene: modes of action to promote prostate health. Arch Biochem Biophys.  2004; 430: 127-34.Obermüller-Jevic UC, Olano-Martin E,  Corbacho AM, Eiserich JP, van der Vliet A, Valacchi G, et al.: Lycopene  inhibits the growth of normal human prostate epithelial cells in vitro. J Nutr.  2003; 133: 3356-60.Nickel JC, True LD, Krieger JN,  Berger RE, Boag AH, Young ID: Consensus development of a histopathological  classification system for chronic prostatic inflammation. BJU Int. 2001; 87: 797-805. Kohnen PW, Drach GW: Patterns  of inflammation in prostatic hyperplasia: a histologic and bacteriologic study.  J Urol. 1979; 121: 755-60.Nickel JC, Downey J, Young I, Boag  S: Asymptomatic inflammation and/or infection in benign prostatic hyperplasia.  BJU Int. 1999; 84: 976-81. Robert G, Descazeaud A, Nicolaïew N,  Terry S, Sirab N, Vacherot F, et al.: Inflammation in benign prostatic  hyperplasia: a 282 patients' immunohistochemical analysis. Prostate. 2009; 69:  1774-80.Mishra VC, Allen DJ, Nicolaou C,  Sharif H, Hudd C, Karim OM, et al.: Does intraprostatic inflammation have a  role in the pathogenesis and progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia? BJU  Int. 2007; 100: 327-31.Sebastiano C, Vincenzo F, Tommaso C,  Giuseppe S, Marco R, Ivana C, et al.: Dietary patterns and prostatic diseases.  Front Biosci (Elite Ed). 2012; 4: 195-204.Vela Navarrete R, Garcia Cardoso JV,  Barat A, Manzarbeitia F, López Farré A: BPH and inflammation: pharmacological  effects of Permixon on histological and molecular inflammatory markers. Results  of a double blind pilot clinical assay. Eur Urol. 2003; 44: 549-55. Magri V, Trinchieri A, Perletti G,  Marras E: Activity of Serenoa repens, lycopene and selenium on prostatic  disease: evidences and hypotheses. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2008; 80: 65-78.Bonvissuto G, Minutoli L, Morgia G,  Bitto A, Polito F, Irrera N, et al.: Effect of Serenoa repens, lycopene, and  selenium on proinflammatory phenotype activation: an in vitro and in vivo  comparison study. Urology.  2011; 77: 248.e9-16. De Nunzio C, Kramer G, Marberger M,  Montironi R, Nelson W, Schröder F, et al.: The controversial relationship  between benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer: the role of  inflammation. Eur Urol. 2011; 60: 106-17.Gui-Zhong L, Libo M, Guanglin H,  Jianwei W: The correlation of extent and grade of inflammation with serum PSA  levels in patients with IV prostatitis. Int Urol Nephrol. 2011; 43: 295-301. Ozden C, Ozdal OL, Guzel O, Han O, Seckin S, Memis A: The correlation  between serum prostate specific antigen levels and asymptomatic inflammatory  prostatitis. Int  Urol Nephrol. 2007; 39: 859-63.Kandirali E, Boran C, Serin E, Semercioz A, Metin A: Association of  extent and aggressiveness of inflammation with serum PSA levels and PSA density  in asymptomatic patients. Urology. 2007; 70: 743-7.   _____________________Submitted for publication:
 October 10, 2012
   ___________________Accepted after revision:
 January 15, 2013
   ______________________Correspondence address:
 Dr. Giorgio Ivan RussoUniversity of Catania, Italy
 Fax: + 39  095 378-2373
 E-mail: giorgioivan@virgilio.it
   |